Atomic Bass Earphones For iPhones iPods Android And Mobile Phones

I have been involved within the Internet Marketing Industry for over five years now. Although I have a day job as an plumber in an respected firm, I still find time to maintain my personal blog and give you 10 to 20 blog posts a day. Writing is his passion Earpiece by doing exactly what he likes to do – write, write and write some more.

audioMusic lovers around the world have often been promised amazing atomic bass from many a pair of earphones bought in-store or over the Internet and found themselves instantly returning or handing them over to their kid brother who has no conception of what amazing bass is all about.

Bass aficionados understand that the music they listen to should come through crystal clear, without distortion, or a sound similar to car speakers that clinked and clanked back in the 80s. Additionally, earphones that produce beautiful bass must fit snug in the ear for full impact, while inspiring hours of listening because they are undeniably comfortable.

Atomic Bass Earphones offer a combination of amazing bass and ultimate comfort. Featuring soft earbuds that slip easily into the ear canal, a built in microphone for phone calls and ultra-light aluminum housing, you can’t go wrong! Atomic Bass are ideal iphones earphones and earphones for ipad.

Not to mention that CNET and other major reviewers have placed Atomic Bass in the best earphones/earbuds category. Radius Earphones are also perfect for Android phones, computers, PC tablets, iPods, Blackberries and more.

Atomic Bass earphones with mic fit so snugly in the ear that they are perfect for just about any activity under the sun. Whether you are heading out for a run, going on a rock climbing expedition, riding your bike to work, driving on the way to work, shopping at your favorite mall or sitting on your couch at home, you’ll always experience unparalleled comfort.
Enjoy a comfortable and secure fit earphone (www.monvans.com) for extended use – without pain or ear fatigue. Atomic Bass are easily stored when they aren’t being used within an included pouch that can be placed strategically in your computer bag or purse.

Many are under the false assumption that to experience amazing bass, one has to spend hundreds of dollars on earphones. Atomic Bass Earphones retail for only $39, and their innovator & manufacturer Radius Earphones are so certain that its customers (including you) will love them, so they offer a money back guarantee.
What’s more…the company prides itself on creating top-quality products and takes its guarantee a step further by offering a 1-year replacement policy if their products fail or are damaged. To learn more about Radius’ guarantees and catalog of products, visit Radius Earphones Ordering is secure & easy and delivery is always prompt!

広告

Xbox One vs PlayStation 4: Which controller is better?

audioThe world is full of really awesome, well written posts. If you find one that catches your eye, you have got to post it, well i do! so with authorization of the original author i have posted this so that you can benefit from

As the new consoles from Microsoft and Sony go head to head on the high street, gamers are getting their hands on the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 controllers for the first time.
Both companies have spent tens of thousands of dollars in researching and designing the shape, features and feel of their pads.
After all, if the lifespan of the last generation is anything to go by, people will still be using them in a decade.
But which pad comes out on top?

PlayStation 4At first glance Sony’s new pad looks similar to the previous generation’s DualShock 3 controller. A closer look reveals it’s slightly wider, with a curvier shape.
The new L2 and R2 buttons feel more like triggers, and Select and Start have given way to by Share and Option buttons.
All new features include the light bar, which can change colour to tell you which player you are in a multiplayer game, or as a health indicator. It also has an internal speaker, a headset socket and a touch pad which doubles as a clickable button.
Xbox OneThe new controller from Microsoft is very much an evolution of the Xbox 360 pad, taking the best bits of the previous design and honing them. All the older controller’s buttons are present, and only the guide button has moved significantly.
The biggest change is that instead of having a bulky battery pack attached to the back of the controller, two AA batteries sit snugly within the body of the pad. As a result, the contour of the rear of the pad is a single, smooth curve.
ReactionSo how have the gaming public reacted to the new pads?
Jay Budd, commenting on YouTube said “I like the Xbox One controller. Wasn’t a fan of the thumb sticks at first, but got used to it after an hour or so.”
Microsoft have drawn criticism for using their own connector for headsets.
The console comes with one, but if you want another you’ll have to shell out about £25 for Microsoft’s official Xbox One chat headset – for now at least.
Sony, on the other hand, have included a standard 3.5mm headphones jack, so any standard headset – such as Apple’s iPhone Earpods – will work.
YouTube user Neo Jeeto took issue with some of the new features of both controllers, saying: “I hate the Share and Option buttons, and the rougher grip texture on the [DualShock 4], but I like the sticks and triggers.
“I don’t like the triggers or bumpers on the Xbox One controller, but I like the sticks better than the 360.”
It’ll take time for many hardened gamers to decide which of the two pads is their favourite, but Timothy J Seppala, a contributing editor at tech blog Engadget has made up his mind already.
@adanzis the ps4 controller is the best one I’ve ever used. No lie.
– Timothy J. Seppala (@timseppala) November 16, 2013

Police hearing loss: £135m paid in compensation

Thankyou for reading my website, here’s a piece i actually enjoyed reading. With their agreement i can repost it. I compose lots of my own posts, but occasionally post other articles i find remarkable, thanks for reading.

headphonesPolice have paid out more than £135m to settle claims by former officers who said their hearing was damaged during the course of their duties.

Almost half that bill, more than £65m, was for legal fees.
Details of payments have been revealed by the PSNI in response to a Freedom of Information request by Belfast-based victims group Relatives for Justice.
Up to the end of November, compensation was paid to 8,641 former officers, with hundreds of other claims pending.

As the only routinely armed police force in the UK, the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) officers had to undergo regular firearms training.
It has been established that since the late 1960s, police sources were aware of medical evidence that they had to provide sufficient ear protection for anyone involved in this kind of activity.
Firing ranges This is a legal principle referred to as the “date of knowledge”.
But the RUC did not provide “industry standard” ear protection for another three decades.

One former officer who received compensation spoke of his experience on firing ranges.
“Even when ear protection was introduced, it was sometimes of a very poor standard and there weren’t always enough sets of headphones to go around,” he said.
“If you were waiting for your turn on the range, it wasn’t uncommon to have to simply put your fingers in your ears when standing close to someone firing a gun.
“When we trained with the army, soldiers would shake their heads in amazement at our lack of proper equipment.”

More than 10,000 former RUC officers have lodged claims for damages, saying their hearing was damaged.
Enormous compensation The claims include officers who claim to have suffered hearing loss as a result of frequent radio use, while being transported in helicopters and while driving motorcycles.
However, the vast majority of claims are for damage caused during firearms training.
The figures involved in compensation are enormous.

In response to the Freedom of Information request from Relatives for Justice, the PSNI revealed that, up the end of November, the total amount paid out to settle cases was £135,357,689.
Of that total, £70,161,788 was damages paid to former officers, while £65,195,901 was for legal and court costs.
SDLP MLA Alban Maginness, a barrister and member of Stormont’s justice committee, said the legal costs were unacceptable and could have been greatly reduced.

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.
SDLP MLA Alban Maginness described the compensation figures as shocking
“I have raised this issue on a number of occasions,” he said.
“It is a shocking figure and the Policing Board and the Department of Justice have questions to answer about how this was allowed to happen.
‘Devastating’ “The police could have taken a much broader approach instead of contesting every case, when medical evidence had been provided stating that there had been hearing loss.

“That would have saved a substantial sum of money.”
Sinn F訮 MLA Pat Sheehan said the amount of money paid out to the former officers was unjustifiable.
“The amount of money, £135m, involved is extortionate. This is clearly unjustifiable and can not be stood over,” he said.
“These officers were well paid and this public money could have been used elsewhere.”
However, former detective superintendent Alan Mains, who received compensation for hearing loss while on duty, defended the pay-outs.

“Collectively speaking, it looks like a phenomenal sum. But it could have been dealt with a lot differently… if they had taken a broad common sense approach, instead of challenging medical evidence,” he said.
“The reason why we had to carry guns in the first place is pretty obvious – we were the only police service in all of the UK (to have to do so).”
Edwards and Company solicitors have settled claims for more than 3,000 officers, and another 500 are in the pipeline.

One of its senior partners said the affects of hearing loss could be devastating.
Dorcas Crawford cited the example of one client who suffered from a constant ringing sound in his ears, a condition known as tinnitus.
“His case was terribly severe, the worst I have heard of, so much so that when he went to see the hearing consultant, he asked him if he could possibly make him deaf because he would prefer to be deaf than to have to cope with the tinnitus,” she said.

“The sad fact, of course, is that the consultant couldn’t do that, and even if he was completely deaf he would still have the tinnitus, but it simply drove him insane.”
She also rejected any suggestion that former officers could make false claims.
“Hearing loss can be objectively measured,” she said.
Medical evidence “In every case settled by the Crown Solicitors Office, clients are tested and examined by two doctors, one acting for their solicitor and the other acting for the police, and medical reports are produced.

“Those medical reports then determine the extent of the compensation claim.”
While her company has benefited financially by representing officers with hearing loss claims, she agrees with Mr Maginness that the police could have significantly reduced the legal bill by accepting medical evidence instead of contesting every case.
“Virtually every single case, except for a tiny, tiny minority, are settled at door of court, so generally I really don’t see any reason why those could not have been settled once the medical evidence was on for both sides,” she said.

Mark Thompson’s organisation, Relatives for Justice, made the Freedom of Information request “I don’t for one minute suggest that the Crown simply pay out money where the case hasn’t been proven, but the case is proven at the earliest stage when they’ve got both medical reports.
“My estimate would be that they could have saved around half of that sum for legal costs by settling cases at an early stage.”
‘Unfair’ The group that sent the Freedom of Information request to the police described the sums of money involved as “appalling”.

Mark Thompson, director of Relatives for Justice, said it was unfair that so much has been spent paying the legal costs for former officers, at the same time as those taking action against the police and State were having their legal aid cut.
“We represent people who have been victims of the conflict and are trying to take action against the police and they are having their legal aid cut, and the lawyers that represent them have been condemned by some unionist politicians,” he said.

“But here we have the police spending tens of millions of pounds in damages to former police officers, and paying out tens of millions in legal costs and we don’t hear those politicians asking questions about it. That is simply unacceptable.”
In a statement, the PSNI said: “All hearing loss claims have to be thoroughly investigated.
“The chief constable is fully aware of his responsibility to the public purse and the strategy for handling hearing loss litigation has been kept under review by the Chief Constable’s lawyers and the Crown Solicitor’s Office with the aim of ensuring that claims are dealt with as economically as is possible given the technical aspects of the cases and the individual circumstances of each.”

The PSNI also said all legal costs were closely scrutinised and “have been challenged by the Chief Constable’s lawyers when appropriate”.

If you have any kind of queries about exactly where as well as the best way to work with walkie Talkie Earpiece, you possibly can call us from our web site.